Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

7

whichof the following best explains why the game of economics is about setting goals as much as it is about making allocation de

cisions?

2 answers:

Maurinko [17]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

c.some economic goals are incompatible with each other

Explanation:

apexs

Xelga [282]2 years ago

5 0

There are different and incompatible economic goals. (APEX Class ;)

You might be interested in

Which staff member usually does the work of both a front desk clerk and an accounting clerk?

fomenos

D for sure is the correct answer

8 0

2 years ago

Jack just bought a car. what risk does he face?

Oxana [17]

Jack can face multiple risks.

He can be injured or killed in a car wreck.

He can injure or kill someone in a car wreck.

Bills.

Car note.

Gas Money

Tickets.

Parking.

Hope this helps Buddy!

- Courtney

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 1903, for the first time in u.s. history, congress passed a law declaring that a person holding a specific political viewpoin

mojhsa [17]

In 1903, the congress passed a law declaring that a person holding a specific political viewpoint could be banned from entering the nation, these were the <u>anarchists</u>.

<h3>Who are the anarchists?</h3>

These are group of people that holds the theory that is skeptical of the justification of authority and power, they pursues that cluster of doctrines and attitudes centered on the belief that government is both harmful and unnecessary.

The first person to be call an anarchist was the French writer called Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. In his study, he argued that the real laws of society have nothing to do with authority but rather stem from the nature of society itself and he foresaw the eventual dissolution of authority and the emergence of a natural social order.

Read more about anarchists

brainly.com/question/843610

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago

You purchased 5,400 shares in the New Pacific Growth Fund on January 2, 2016, at an offering price of $63.90 per share. The fron

Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

The total return from this investment is -2.35%

Explanation:

According to the give data You invested = 5,400 x $63.90 = $345,060

Because of the front-load, your effective investment = $345,060 x (1 - 5%) = $327,807

Value of assets increases by 6% in 2016, hence, your investment value = $327,807 x (1 + 6%) = $347,475

Fund expense of 1.87% must be deducted from this value, Investment value = $347,475 x (1 - 1.05%) = $343,826

Now, because you withdrew within a year, back-end load of 2% is applicable as well.

Hence, your net withdrawal =$343,826 x (1 - 2%) = $336,949

Hence, total return = $336,949 / $345,060 - 1 = -2.35%

The total return from this investment is -2.35%

4 0

2 years ago

The following selected transactions were completed by Capers Company during October of the current year:

Zarrin [17]

Answer:

Date Accounts title and explanations Debit$ Credit$

1-Oct Merchandise inventory 15458

Accounts payable - Sabol imports 15458

3-Oct Merchandise Inventory 9850

Accounts payable- Saxon Co. 9650

Cash account 200

4-Oct Merchandise Inventory 13550

Accounts payable- Schnee Co. 13550

6-Oct Accounts payable -Schnee Co 4350

Merchandise inventory 4350

13-Oct Accounts payable-Saxon Co 9650

Cash account 9457

Merchandise inventory 193

(9650*2%)

14-Oct Accounts payable-Schnee Co 9200

Cash account 9016

Merchandise inventory 184

(9200*2%)

19-Oct Merchandise inventory 27270

Accounts payable - Southmont Co 27270

19-Oct Merchandise inventory 375

Cash account 375

20-Oct Merchandise inventory 21400

Accounts payable -Stevens 21400

30-Oct Accounts payable-Stevens 21400

Cash account 21186

Merchandise inventory 214

(21400*1%)

31-Oct Accounts payable-Sabol imports 15458

Cash account 15458

31-Oct Accounts payable -Southmont Co 27270

Cash account 27270

7 0

3 years ago