The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "TRUE." The sudden partition of India led to violence and chaos. The statement is true. It is true that the sudden partition of India led to violence and chaos - which is not good for a country.
Answer:
<em>B, Preparing for the experiment, several slides were fixed with dye.</em>
Explanation:
<h3>
Modifiers</h3>
Modifiers are simple words or phrases used to add emphasis to another word in a sentence. Adjectives and adverbs are used to provide emphasis to nouns and verbs respectively. Clauses and phrases can also be used as modifiers in a sentence. <em>The </em><em>nice </em><em>Child; </em><em> </em>In the example, the adjective shows us that the Child is nice and it is the modifier.
<h3>Dangling Modifiers</h3>
A modifier is considered dangling when the word that its will modifier is not contained in the sentence. For example, the nice ........; the nice in this example is dangling because it does not have a word to modify.
Preparing for the experiment, several slides were fixed with dye contains a dangling modifier. "Preparing for experiment" is expressing an action, but the person experimenting is not known. Since the person performing the experiment is not known the phrase "<em>preparing for the experiment</em>" is considered a dangling modifier because it is not modifying any word in the sentence.
In the Mesopotamia which includes <span>Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and Syria.</span>
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. <span>Miranda rights include all of the following except the right to a phone call. The right to a phone call seems so out of place here. This right is not being tackled in the Miranda rights. Hope this answers the question.</span>
<span>In the scenario in which Joel who
is displeased with his son's lifestyle choices and, instead of dividing
his estate and wants to leave all of his property to his daughter, Marie, when he dies, Joel </span>may disinherit his son for any reason as long as Joel indicates in the will that the son was
omitted on purpose.