Answer:
"You should volunteer to tutor! Imagine all of the students you could help with tutoring. I would want somebody who knows the subject to help me if I was struggling."
Explanation:
With pathos, you want to appeal to someone's emotions. You want the person to feel some sort of emotion.
Answer:
1.What is the central idea of Langston terrace?
The correct answer is C, the Great Depression had an impact on people's lives. This is because Langston Terrace was a federal house project that allowed people to live for a cheaper cost while still having a good living option. Because the Depression caused such an impact, help was needed for them to find cheap housing in order to avoid bigger problems, like addiction or homelessness.
<span>This Poet is from the Poetical Works of A. Pope
I believe that this poet refers to the medieval ages, since it was written by a pope and talks about kings and their strength where they compare it to the wind and the sea. </span>
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
