<span>I this case, the loan is still valid and at that point Mike would be responsible for finding a way to pay the loan back as agreed upon in the contract. This is called co-signing, when two parties both sign for a loan together. Both parties are responsible for the loan and even though David cannot be found, the loan must still be paid and Mike would be held responsible for this.</span>
Answer:
According to the Blake/Mouton grid, Daniel falls under the produce-or-perish management style, also known as the authority compliance style
Explanation:
This management style is very autocratic, very much a Theory X management style.
Daniel is very autocratic, has strict rules and policies. In the short run, this management style can achieve high productive results, but in the long run the low morale of the workers will end up hurting their performance. Daniel believes that his employees are just a means to an end, and that their needs are secondary and not important.
The answer is company’s rules and policies. These two form the instructions of behavior in an organization, outlining the duties of both employees and employers. Company policies and rules are prepared to guard the rights of workers as well as the commercial interests of managers. Contingent on the needs of the organization, various policies and procedures create rules concerning employee conduct, dress code, attendance, confidentiality and other extents associated to the terms and situations of work.
Answer:
The correct answer is What Goods and Services should be produced.
Explanation:
The problem ‘what to produce’ can be divided into two related questions. First, which goods are to be produced and which not; and second, in what quantities those goods, which the economy has decided to produce, are to be produced. If productive resources were unlimited we could produce as many numbers of goods as we liked and, therefore, the question “What goods to be produced and what not” would not have arisen. But because resources are in fact scarce relative to human wants, an economy must choose among different alternative collections of goods and services that it should produce.
If the Society decides to produce particular goods in a larger quantity, it will have to withdraw resources from the production of some other goods. Further, an economy has to decide how much resources should be allocated for the production of consumer goods and how much for capital goods. In other words, an economy has to decide the respective quantities of consumer goods and capital goods to be produced.
The choice between consumer goods and capital goods involves the choice between the present and the future. If the society decides to produce more capital goods, some resources will have to be taken away from the production of consumer goods and. therefore, the production of consumer goods would have to be cut down. But greater amount of capital goods would make possible the production of larger quantities of consumer goods in the future. Thus, we see that some current consumption has to be sacrificed for the sake of more consumption in the future.
In 20 years you'll have $5,220.
2,000×0.08=160
2,000+(160×20)= 5,220.
