Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
e. 71 dollars
Explanation:
Peter was willing to but the wine for $45
In a year, there is an increase of $15 = $45 + $15 = $60
The interest rate of 10% of $60 = $6
Total = $66 ~ $70
Therefore, the amount he is willing to pay for the win if he buys it as investment would be 71 dollars.
Answer and Explanation:
The consumer price index refers to an index in which the prescribed market cost of goods & services by the prices years from the base year prices of the prescribed market basket and then it is multiplied by 100.
But the Gross Domestic Inflator would be represented when the all types of prices of goods and services generated domestically
An increase in the price refelected the GDP deflator
And, the decrease in the price of treewood represents CPI
Here are the
things needed to be considered:
20 feet= 1
TEU
40 feet= 1
TEU
<span>For 70
twenty-foot containers, multiply it with the conversion factor (1 TEU/1
twenty-foot) then cancel the twenty-foot unit. The answer is 70 TEUs. As for 30
forty-foot containers, you apply the same process but you use the 2nd conversion
factor which is (2 TEUs/ 1 forty-foot). The answer is 60 TEUs. </span>
<span>So 70+ 60= 130 TEUs
</span>
