For people to associate their food, not with unhealthy lifestyles but au contraire with lifestyles that Evoque nutrition-consciousness.
<u>As we now, classical conditioning happens thanks to an association. In the olden days, doctors used to advertise cigarettes, for people to see cigarettes as a healthy habit. By associating doctors and cigarettes people will assume that smoking wasn't that bad because a Doctor who is a person concerned with health was recomending them. </u>
<u>The same principle applies here.</u>
Seeing an athlete recommending a certain brand of fast food would make people think that maybe, that particular brand is healthier than others.
There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did. We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept. Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true. Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.
One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people. Roman religion was based on transactions. If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return. It was like buying something on Amazon. By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe. God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things. Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.
A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code. Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives. The gods did not care how people acted towards one another. The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave. This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.
Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature. The Roman world was very unequal. There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves. The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable. This is where Christianity was so different. It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God. Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.
Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.
week 1 : changing water into wine
week 2: healing the Royal officials son
week 3: healing the paralytic at the pool
week: 4 feeding over 5,000 with fish and loaves week : 5 walking on water week 6 healing a man born blind and week : 7 raising lazaurs from the dead
Answer: Cheerfulness, positive attitude
Explanation:
Customer service is part of the backbone of business. How customers are treated would determine how long the business would last, when customers are not treated well, there won't be a growth regarding the business, employees would need this in mind considering the various kinds of clients they would come across and it's very obvious they won't be the same, a lot of positive mindedness and cheerfulness is required, this is what is required a lot for Susan's job
Answer: Option (C)
Explanation:
Sedition is referred to as or known as the overt conduct, i.e. organization and speech, that is inclined toward the insurrection against already established orders. It often tends to includes the subversion of the constitution and also incitement of the discontent in regards, or the resistance against the established authority.
