<span>Gandhi's response was to hold a satyagraha [holding to the truth], a campaign of civil disobedience expressed in nonviolent resistance to what he regarded as unjust laws. He organized his first while in South Africa in 1907. </span>
Answer:
Phishing
Explanation:
This is classic example of phishing where the bad people try to "fish" your information from you by acting like legit companies.
During 1960s and 1970s in administration of President Lyndon Johnson, criminal justice became an academic subject.
Criminal justice is the interdisciplinary academic study of police, criminal courts, correctional institutions (for example, prisons), and juvenile justice agencies, as well as the agents who work within these institutions. Criminal justice differs from criminal law, which defines the specific behaviors that are prohibited and punishable by law, and criminology, which is the scientific study of the nonlegal aspects of crime and delinquency, such as their causes, correction, and prevention. In the second half of the twentieth century, the field of criminal justice emerged in the United States.
Learn more on criminal justice -
brainly.com/question/24622613
Answer:
example of construct validity
Explanation:
Construct validity refers to how accurate a study can measure / provide data about the things it claim in the initial description. From the case above, Tara's study claim that it measure<em> 'how social college students are with friends at lunch compared to at dinner' . </em>
In order to measure this, Tara only use 'duration of eye contact' as an indicator of measure it.
The thing is, Social interaction is done with many type of actions, including spoken communication, skin contact, laughter, opened body language ,etc. Only using eye contact will cut off the people who rely their socialization process on these other actions. Because of this, we can say that this study is lacking in validity.
Answer:
Option A would be the appropriate choice.
Explanation:
- Self-enhancement throughout behavioral finance seems to be a reasonably believe bias, it is indeed common for people to claim credit for certain achievements while allowing certain personalities or environmental events with next to no consideration.
- Naturally, participants are programmed to assign derogatory facts concerning ourselves towards external influences to maintain everyone's self-esteem.
Some other alternatives provided weren't concerning the circumstance given. So option A will become the right one.
