1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kherson [118]
3 years ago
8

Just as two colors will, when carefully mixed, form a third and different color (yellow and blue, for example, produce green), s

o too it is sometimes possible to see in the cooperative efforts of living things a resultant accomplishment that defies description on the basis of the characteristics of the creatures involved. A description of the traits and performances of the individual members of a hive of honeybees or a championship athletic team hardly serves to describe the results of their joint efforts.
History
2 answers:
Kobotan [32]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

This statement is incorrect:

Just as two colors will, when carefully mixed, form a third and different color (yellow and blue, for example, produce green), so too it is sometimes possible to see in the cooperative efforts of living things a resultant accomplishment that defies description on the basis of the characteristics of the creatures involved. A description of the traits and performances of the individual members of a hive of honeybees or a championship athletic team hardly serves to describe the results of their joint efforts.

Explanation:

The reasons behind this are two. The first one is that in this paragraph we understand that the main idea is that individual effort can't describe the results of joint efforts. But they can describe it. If we analyze a group's joint effort for parts, or segments we can understand the specific role of each one, and how they contribute to achieving the major goal or the group's goal. For example, a goalkeeper is the only one in the team able to defend the goal sheet all the time, and with the allowance of using his or her hands. If his or her individual effort wasn't performed, the rival team would be able to score goals easier than without him or her. In other words, the individual word can describe the results of joint efforts if we analyze them as a system made of different small processes.

LiRa [457]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. The race goes to the swift.

B. Two is company while three is a crowd

C. A birt in the hand is worth two in the bush

D. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Please help. No links. No nonsense.
Ghella [55]

Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.

3 0
3 years ago
How were women viewed by most of society in the 1950’s? How did this change in the 1960’s?
Harman [31]

1950s:

In 1950's women were not women, they were slaves. They were not counted as human. They had no right to vote. They were just slaves of their husband. The women's role was to look after the children and husband, cook dinner, clean the dishes and at the end of the busy day they would have to make sure that their husband is comfortable at night when he was sleeping. Which finally gave you a couple of hours sleep at night but not long before you would have to wake up and start the same day over again. But now women have rights to do everything they want to do. They have freedom to say anything, to vote, to do anything, to go anywhere they want to go. Now days women can work. They can stand in elections. All these things were not available for women in 1950's. This role is significant in Canadian history because it shows that women also can do things that man can do. They are not different, they are also human being and as strong as a men. This shows that in our country not only men are brave and only men can do anything but women also are very brave and they can give competition to men. Women are brave and talented. I chose this event because this event shows that you should never underestimate any body. People in 1950's thought that women can not do anything but that's not true, women can do anything.

change in the 1960s:

In the 1960s, deep cultural changes were altering the role of women in American society. More females than ever were entering the paid workforce, and this increased the dissatisfaction among women regarding huge gender disparities in pay and advancement and sexual harassment at the workplace. One of the most profound changes was happening in the bedroom. By the end of the Sixties, more than 80 percent of wives of childbearing age were using contraception after the federal government in 1960 approved a birth control pill. This freed many women from unwanted pregnancy and gave them many more choices, and freedom, in their personal lives. Gradually, Americans came to accept some of the basic goals of the Sixties feminists: equal pay for equal work, an end to domestic violence, curtailment of severe limits on women in managerial jobs, an end to sexual harassment, and sharing of responsibility for housework and child rearing. .

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which criteria would you use to decide if this piece of writing would be acceptes by the church. It’s a religion question
Alik [6]

Answer:

ok...........................................

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How did Adam Smith believe individuals would help their home countries economies without government regulation
ikadub [295]

Answer:

He believed that more wealth to common people would benefit a nation's economy and society as a whole.

Explanation:

In The Wealth of Nations, Smith described a self-regulating market. It was self-regulating because people produced according to what people would buy and people consumed according to what they wanted and could afford.

4 0
3 years ago
Question 28 of 50
KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

Blacklists.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does carnegie think it is better to build public institutions than to give charity to the poor?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did england become vulnerable to attack around the beginning of the fifth century
    10·1 answer
  • What expedition did thomas jefferson establish to explore the West under the leadership of Lewis and Clark
    5·2 answers
  • The implementation of judicial decisions is dependent upon ___________ because _________
    14·1 answer
  • The Boxer Rebellion in 1900 was an attempt to..
    15·2 answers
  • Which building did the revolutionaries attack to gain weapons? Versailles Palace O Notre Dame Cathedral O O O Louvres Palace​
    6·1 answer
  • Describe how Theodora influenced/affected others.​
    9·1 answer
  • What makes Brazil different from the rest of Latin America?
    14·1 answer
  • What do the events that led to the hundred years' war suggest about the nature of medieval warfare?
    11·1 answer
  • Two musicians joined Bill Monroe's band in 1945 and had a major impact on
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!