The slope of the first equation has a slope of one and a y intercept of -4. The second equation has a y intercept of -2.3333 as seen when plugging in 0 for x, so the same y-intercept and same line are out of the question. This means either they have the same slope and thus are parallel or intersect at some point. A simple way to find out? Plug in 1 for x on the second. If it isn't -1.33333, which is a slope of positive 1 such as in the first equation, they WILL INTERSECT somewhere. When plugging in 1, we get
3y - 1 = -7
3y = -6
y = -2
(1, -2) is the next point after (0, -2.3333)
That means it is most certainly not the same slope, and thus they will intersect at some point. The two slopes are 1/1 and 1/3 if you weren't aware.
Answer:
y -11 = 2(x -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope of the given line is the x-coefficient: 2. The parallel line will have the same slope.
When you know the slope and a point on the line, it is convenient to use the point-slope form of the equation of a line:
y -k = m(x -h) . . . . . . line with slope m through point (h, k)
Your line's equation is ...
y -11 = 2(x -3)
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
231
Answer:
99
Step-by-step explanation:
The distance between 0 and 99 is 99
Step-by-step explanation:
We will prove by contradiction. Assume that 
is an odd prime but n is not a power of 2. Then, there exists an odd prime number p such that 
. Then, for some integer 
,
Therefore
Here we will use the formula for the sum of odd powers, which states that, for 
and an odd positive number 
,
Applying this formula in 1) we obtain that
.
Then, as 
we have that 
is not a prime number, which is a contradiction.
In conclusion, if is an odd prime, then n must be a power of 2.
