Sabric and Jessica disagree over an inequality statement. Sabric claims that –3.613 > –3.63. Jessica claims that –3.613 <
–3.63. Which statement about each student's claim is true? Jessica is correct because 3.613 is larger than 3.63. Therefore, –3.63 lies to the right of –3.613 on a number line. Jessica is correct because 3.613 is smaller than 3.63. Therefore, –3.63 lies to the right of –3.613 on a number line. Sabric is correct because 3.613 is larger than 3.63. Therefore, –3.613 lies to the right of –3.63 on a number line. Sabric is correct because 3.613 is smaller than 3.63. Therefore, –3.613 lies to the left of –3.63 on a number line.
Answer: Sabric is correct because 3.613 is smaller than 3.63. Therefore, –3.613 lies to the left of –3.63 on a number line.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Sabric's claim = –3.613 > –3.63
Jessica's claim = –3.613 < –3.63
From the claims above, - 3.613 is greater than - 3.63, this is because both numbers are negative and as such moving towards the left hand side of the number line from 0. - 3.613 will be encountered first before - 3.630, which signifies that - 3.613 is greater than - 3.630
Let t=number of years since 1991. Then P(t)=147 e^(kt) ... in millions P(0)=147 e^(0)=147 P(7)=147 e^(7k)=153 e^(7k)=(153/147) take ln both sides ln(e^(7k))=ln(153/147) 7k=0.0400 => k=0.005715
Year 2017=>t=2017-1991=26 P(26)=147e^(26*.005715)=170.55 Answer: in 2017, the projected population is 170.55 millions.
you have to follow pemdas first get rid of the parethase which leaves you with 2+3x+6x=-4x+8x+1 then you add what you can do then you get 2+9x=4x+1 then you subtract 2 from both sides and subtract 4x from both sides which leaves you with 5x=-1 then you divide 5 from both sides and get x=-1/5
