Authoritarian parenting is believed to help children succeed and achieve important goals.
Every situation is different, but research shows that many Asian parents follow an authoritarian parenting style. This may be due to the emphasis on cultural values related to parental control and academic excellence.
The American Sociological Association also published his 2002 study, Parents have shown a preference for a disciplinary or authoritarian approach to parenting.
Parents use this approach for a variety of reasons. Many people choose this style because of their nationality, culture, or ethical background. It could also be because of how they were raised and ignorance of other ways after all, ruling with an iron fist is the best way to keep children under control I believe it is.
Learn more about authoritarian parenting at
brainly.com/question/11997586
#SPJ4
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Diplomacy is when countries try to solve their problems without unnecessary fighting. Instead, they solve the problem to find a compromise. Diplomacy ensures that problems can be solved in a healthy manner without millitary conflict.
Hope this Helps!
Answer:
Parents and infants usually sleep on hard surfaces, such as floor mats, firm mattresses or wooden planks.
Explanation:
Co-sleeping is like a proximity or nearness or sharing bed with your child. Sharing about the same bed or the same room.
There are different type of co-sleeping occur in a different culture.
- Family bed
- The sidecar arrangement
- Different bed in the same room
- The children are permitted in parents' bed when they needed.
Benefits :
- Parents get as much need of sleep.
- Breastfeeding is easy when the baby is nearby to the parents.
- In parents room baby reduces the risk of SIDS.
No nutritional supplements cant help to reduce stress.
Several vitamins and other supplements have been associated with reducing stress symptoms, including Rhodiola Rosea, melatonin, glycine, and ashwagandha. L-theanine, B-complex vitamins, and kava also help build the body's resistance to life's stressors.
Although it’s very important to eat a diet that includes all the vitamins and minerals you need to keep you healthy, vitamin and mineral supplements aren’t a quick fix when you aren’t eating right. No nutritional supplements really take the place of a glass of orange juice or slices of fresh fruit. Nor has it ever been proven that vitamin or mineral supplements will fight stress or calm nerves.
Learn more about nutritional supplements at
brainly.com/question/9348916
#SPJ4
Tariffs have historically served a key role in the trade policy of the United States. Their purpose was to generate revenue for the federal government and to allow for import substitution industrialization (industrialization of a nation by replacing foreign imports with domestic production) by acting as a protective barrier around infant industries.[1] They also aimed to reduce the trade deficit and the pressure of foreign competition. Tariffs were one of the pillars of the American System that allowed the rapid development and industrialization of the United States. The United States pursued a protectionist policy from the beginning of the 19th century until the middle of the 20th century. Between 1861 and 1933, they had one of the highest average tariff rates on manufactured imports in the world. However American agricultural and industrial were cheaper than rival products and the tariff had an impact primarily on wool products. After 1942 the U.S. promoted worldwide free trade.
According to Dartmouth economist Douglas Irwin, tariffs have serve three primary purposes: "to raise revenue for the government, to restrict imports and protect domestic producers from foreign competition, and to reach reciprocity agreements that reduce trade barriers."[2] From 1790 to 1860, average tariffs increased from 20 percent to 60 percent before declining again to 20 percent.[2] From 1861 to 1933, which Irwin characterizes as the "restriction period", the average tariffs increased to 50 percent and remained at that level for several decades. From 1934 onwards, which Irwin characterizes as the "reciprocity period", the average tariff declined substantially until it leveled off at 5 percent.[2]
