Part 1
1. The mother's comment wouldn't affect Dimitri because he is still in the pre-operational stage of Cognitive development.
During this stage, the child would most likely haven't develop the cognitive ability that allow him to see a certain scenario for other people's point of view (he wouldn't understand how his friends feel because of his action)
2. In this scenario, even though Dimitri still hasn't reach the stage where he could feel empathy toward other children, he's already capable to connect a certain event with his own emotional response.
So, in order to encourage him to stop the behavior, i would take away his toys while he's playing it. By doing this, Dimitri would understand the effect of his behavior and might stop doing it to other children.
Part 2.
1 <span>Kohlberg might stated that Ryan is moving from a conventional (rule-following) stage of moral reasoning to a post conventional stage.
Post-conventional stage would be the stage where an individual started to develop their own personal moral standard rather than simply conforming to others
.Erickson would point out that Ryan is making personal effort to find his identity and the method that he choose to do this is by trying out different identities to see which one would fit him.</span>
Answer: A) Intragroup conflict
Explanation: intragroup conflict can be simply refered to as verbal disagreement between the members of thesame group which could result to segregation.
For examples, When the members of the production department in a company begins to argue about the best production line they should go with, the fact that they are both in the same department (group) makes this an example of intragroup conflict.
What are the theoretical perspectives in society?
Sociology includes three major theoretical perspectives: the functionalist perspective, the conflict perspective, and the symbolic interactionist perspective (sometimes called the interactionist perspective, or simply the micro view)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The ethical obligations of a multinational corporation towards employment conditions, human rights, environmental pollution, and the use of power are not always clear cut. There are situations whereby the host nations standards are inferior to those of the home nations, this results in ethical issues and there are also situations where the available standards of the host nation are not ethically acceptable resulting in ethical dilemmas. It necessary to note that different countries have their different standards when it comes to employment conditions, human rights and environmental pollutions, this makes it difficult to have a clear cut obligations for multinational corporations, their standards and obligations will vary according to what is prevailing in the host nation.
