Answer:
0.5
They are substitute goods.
Explanation:
Cross price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded of good A to changes in price of good B.
Percentage change in quantity demanded of burgers = (360 - 300) / 300 = 0.2 = 20%
Percentage change in price of hot dog = (2.10 - 1.50) / 1.5 = 0.4 = 40%
Cross price elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded/ percentage change in price
20 / 40 = 0.5
Elasticity of demand is less than 1, so demand is inelastic.
Also, the cross price elasticitiy is positive, so the goods are substitutes goods.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Number of caramels = 20
number cremes = 30 - 20 = 10
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Selling cost of each box = $12.50
Number of pieces of candies held in a box = 30
Cost of producing caramel = $0.25
Cost of producing cremes = $0.45
Now,
let the number of caramels be 'x'
Thus,
Number of cremes = 30 - x
Profit = Selling price - Cost
3 = $12.50 - [ 0.25x + 0.45(30 - x) ]
or
[ 0.25x + 0.45(30 - x) ] = 12.50 - 3
or
0.25x + 13.5 - 0.45x = 9.50
or
-0.20x = 9.50 - 13.5
or
-0.20x = - 4
or
x = 20
Hence,
Number of caramels = 20
number cremes = 30 - 20 = 10
Answer: A. upward
Explanation:
Tariffs are taxes that a Government imposes on imported goods in a bid to protect local producers that are making the same goods.
When a Tariff is implemented, it will make goods from outside more expensive as well as give domestic producers an opportunity to charge higher prices as imports have become more expensive.
Both of these results will pull the domestic prices up.
Answer:
Answer: The basis for the government's challenge to P&G's acquisition of Clorox
Explanation:
The horizontal merger is the basis for the government's challenge to P&G's acquisition of Clorox because the result would have lessened competition substantially in that line of commerce nationwide. P&G being the leading and mainly national advertiser and also mainly national seller of soaps, detergents and cleaners with sales that accounted for 54 % of the market and a leading brand with 48% of national sales.
With this type of advertising and power control which P&G possess, this would put P&G in a position to control the market and potentially detrimentally affect the consumers. These advantages they posses would reduce the number of competitors and lead to greater concentration in the industry they are.