Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
5.2
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because if you look at the expression, there is no term that is raised to the cube root. As a result, this isn't a cubic polynomial. However, this would be a quadratic polynomial cause the highest raised exponent is 2, which is the number for quadratic.
If you liked my response, please consider giving me a Brainliest! Thanks!
0.504854369 as a percentage would be 50.4854369%
easiest way to remember: a percentage is a decimal rounded 2 decimal places to the right
rounded to the nearest tenth, the percentage will be 50.5%
if u need more help tell me
Answer:
C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct option is - C) fails to consider that commuting trips may cause significantly more than 20 percent of the traffic congestion
Reason -
Option A is incorrect because the statistics can not be incorrect.
Option B is incorrect because they are not talking about the city.
Option C is correct because Urban rail reduces congestion.
Option D is incorrect because the opposers cited the example of one city and the supporters are presenting evidence in the case of that city itself.
Option E is incorrect because they are providing an explanation for why the commuters data given by opposers is not relevant. The opposers talked about commuters.
Answer:
2,123.7 square inches
Step-by-step explanation:
