The answer, at least what I got, is 17.375 . They'd have to open an eighteenth package because the extra .375 is not in the original package, so I would go with B .
Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Answer:
y= -7
Step-by-step explanation:
So first distribute the 8
4=8y+32-4y
now combine like terms (the -4y+8y)
4=32+4y
Subtract 32 on both sides to isolate 4y
-28=4y
now divide 4 on both sides to isolate Y
-7=y
so y= -7
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider Cotters paid "x" dollars:
According to given condition:
Moores paid "x+6" dollars.
Both paid total $30
Hence,
(x) + (x+6) = 30
Solving for x:
2x +6 = 30
2x = 30-6
2x = 24
x = 24/2
x = 12
So amount paid by Moores = x +6 = 12+6 = $18
*****To find number of pairs of skates: price of one pair must be given.
Please post complete question.
