Answer:
Price discrimination is when a producer charges different prices, to different consumers for the same good or service. Therefore, an airline that charges different prices to different passengers for the same flight is practicing a third degree price discrimination because consumers are charged different prices based on their different demand elasticities.
Economic efficiency is when scarce resources are used in the most efficient way to produce maximum output; it consists of productive efficiency and allocative efficiency. For price discrimination to be possible, the firm must have a certain degree of monopoly power; that is, the firm must be a price maker. Monopolies typically fit into this description as they discriminate by charging consumers with an inelastic demand higher prices; this reults in allocative ineffciency because price is greater than the Marginal Cost (P>MC).
On the other hand price discrimination could increase efficiency; price discrimination aims to convert consumer surplus to producer surplus, thereby increasing the profit of the firm. An increase in profits could be dedicated to investement in research and development; this could see such a firm achieve dynamic efficiency (long-run productive efficiency). Secondly, due to the increased profits and the potential for more profits, output is increased and price moves closer to the MC (Closer to allocative efficiency). In addition, an increase output would mean that the firm is making use of its spare/idle capacity in production, moving output towards optimum. From another perspective, a firm can reap economies of scale through price discrimination; this is because price discrimination leads to an increase in output and a reduction in average cost.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. $60,000
Explanation:
As per passive income rules, As stated under Internal Revenue Service is a kind of statement that allows to set off the passive loss as against passive income only.
There is no rule which permits to set it off against ordinary income.
Therefore, the details in the given instance are:
Loss of 2015 = ($80,000)
Income in 2016 = $20,000
Loss at the end of 2016 = ($60,000)
This because from the income in 2016 amounting $20,000 the loss of $20,000 is set off.
Answer:
b. the par value of all capital stock issued.
Explanation:
As per the business format, capital of a company is the value of share capital.
Now, also legal capital means the share capital issued as this reflects the legal share of individual investors in the company.
Authorized capital is the value of maximum capital that can be issued by the company in the form of equity shares.
Issued capital is that part of authorized capital that is actually issued.
And therefore, the par value that is the face value of shares issued, that is equity issued is the legal capital of the company.
Answer:
4 millions
Explanation:
First, we will check how much was amortizate for the first loan:
Principal 100 million
on 10 equal payment
amortization per year 100/10 = 10 millions
we refinance at the end of the fourth installment
10 x 4 = 40 millions
The principal at the end of year four:
Principal 100 millions - 40 millions = 60 millions
This amount will be paid on 15 years with 15 equal payment
60 million / 15 years = 4 millions
Answer:
at the time it receives a negotiable warehouse receipt for the bats.
Explanation:
Benson Bearing Company is selling bats to Textron inc. The bats are stored at an independent warehouse not controlled by Benson Company.
Of the contract states that Textron will pick up the bats at the warehouse, the risk of loss passes to Textron when it recieved a negotiable warehouse reciept for the bats.
This is because the warehouse is not controlled by Benson Company and issuing a warehouse reciept is equivalent to delivering the goods to Textron.