Free bus rides would be an extrinsic reward of working at google. The extrinsic rewards are <span>usually financial reward. They are </span>given employees by managers. examples are pay raises, bonuses, and benefits. Intrinsic rewards<span> on the other hand include non-material things such as sense of pleasure, accomplishment and personal achievement and growth. </span>
Answer:
The TRUTH about the soap purchasing options is:
d) it is better to but the 10-ounce bottle because the price per ounce is cheaper.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Cost of 10 ounce bottle of soap = $2.00
The per ounce cost of the 10-ounce bottle of soap = $0.20 ($2/10)
Cost of 20 ounce bottle of soap = $5.00
The per ounce cost of the 20-ounce bottle of soap = $0.25 ($5/20)
Therefore, the 10 ounce bottle of soap is cheaper and better.
b) It is more cost-effective to buy the 10 ounce bottle of soap. With $4.00, one can buy 2 of 10 ounce bottle of soap unlike $5.00 spent for 20 ounce bottle.
Answer: Meeting customer requirements at a profit
Answer:
$5,000
Explanation:
Consequential damages are damages that result from the one party in a contract not performing their part or breaching the contract.
In this case, New Data can sue Mona for consequential damages resulting from Mona not performing her contractual obligations. The damages that New Data can recover = $5,000 which is the profit from the lost sale. The $1,000 spent fixing the computer cannot be recovered.
Answer:
B. The portfolio should be reallocated based on their stated investment objective, reducing the cash and bond percentage by 50% and using the proceeds to buy a small or mid-cap growth mutual fund
Explanation:
Since this couple has stated investment goal of development with moderate hazard, a portfolio that just has about 25% values and that has 75% fixed pay protections is improper - since it will give pay; yet little development. The long haul bond and money designation ought to be decreased and supplanted with development stocks to more readily adjust the portfolio. Decision C is unreasonably theoretical for a "preservationist financial specialist." Choice D is to some degree valid since this couple is putting resources into their manager's stock - yet since the stock just speaks to 8% of the client's all out portfolio, this isn't a too much enormous rate.
