All categories

4 years ago

Why is the Munich pact an example of appeasement

History

2 answers:

erma4kov [3.2K]4 years ago

8 0

The Munich Pact was an attempt to "appease" Hitler and Germany in order to keep Europe at peace.

However, the appeasement of aggressive regimes does not tend to produce peace.

Germany under Hitler began taking over neighboring territories. At first other international powers were not ready to do anything to stop German expansion. After the German occupation of the Rhineland (1936), incorporation of Austria (1938) and occupation of Sudetenland, the British and French prime ministers signed a pact with Hitler at Munich (September, 1938), which essentially gave him control over Czechoslovakia. They thought Hitler would stop there, but he didn't. A year later the Germans invaded Poland, which marked the beginning of World War II in Europe.

olya-2409 [2.1K]4 years ago

3 0

Britain and France gave the Sudetenland to Germany.

You might be interested in

Yuma territorial prison essay

TiliK225 [7]

Yuma territorial prison:

The Yuma Territorial Prison is a previous jail situated in Yuma, Arizona, United States. Opened on July 1, 1876, it is one of the Yuma Crossing and Associated Sites on the National Register of Historic Places in the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area.

Yuma Territorial Prison is a living gallery of the Old West. More than 3,000 desperadoes, indicted for violations extending from polygamy to kill, were detained in rock and adobe cells here during the jail's 33-year presence somewhere in the range of 1876 and 1909.

Arizona State Prison Complex Yuma is a restorative complex made up of five units; Cheyenne, Cibola, Cocopah, Dakota, and La Paz unit. Prisoners can take an interest in an assortment of instruction, treatment, and work programs.

8 0

3 years ago

How powerful is Peter Griffin (including past cutscenes)

Semmy [17]

Answer:

Um, he's a re tard, but I guess he is probably really powerful, he's probably one of those characters who has a secret life that has never been revealed and he's secretly one of the most powerful people in existence or something like that, lol

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In Mexico, power is shared between the national government, 31 state governments, and Mexico City. Which type of government syst

masha68 [24]

Answer:

Federal presidential representative democratic republic.

Explanation:

Considering the above description of the Mexican type of government, the type of government system Mexico has is "Federal presidential representative democratic republic."

This is also evident in the fact that the Mexican government is making use of the congressional system in which there is a President of Mexico serving as both head of state and head of government. The governmental system is also a multi-party system.

8 0

3 years ago

Early in the Renaissance, almost all bankers were people of the Jewish faith. These men provided a much-needed service to fellow

beks73 [17]

Answer: a.Lending money and charging interest went against a teaching of the Catholic Church and was seen as sinful.

Explanation:

Even during the Middle Ages, Jews were a marginalized ethnic group in Europe. They were forced to do many jobs that no one else wanted. One of those jobs is banking. This work in itself implies interest, so the church considered this work a sin. So the Jews did those jobs. Jews also collected taxes in many places. Such prejudices created many prejudices against Jews.

5 0

3 years ago

Summarize the mcdonald vs chicago case

Gala2k [10]

McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.

The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)

Have a good day, afternoon or night!

~Dreamer1331~

3 0

2 years ago