1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
2 years ago
11

joseph stalin was a. a fascist prime minister in italy b. a nazi chancellor in germany c. a cruel leader of the soviet union

History
1 answer:
goldfiish [28.3K]2 years ago
7 0

Joseph Stalin was ( c ) a cruel leader of the Soviet Union. After Lenin´s death Stalin took over as leader of the Soviet Union. He believed that he should change the country from agricultural to industrialized, building factories all over the Soviet Union. He is known for his cruelty. He order several "purges" in which people he thought were against him would be killed or sent to slave labour camps.

You might be interested in
Its about civilizations in 600ce
PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

B. "The improvements in productivity in early agricultural societies enabled more complex societies to develop" is the best option.

Explanation:

This improvement in productivity mostly came from the division of labor, which allowed people to do things other than farm.

5 0
2 years ago
Communities in the South refused to address the problems of inequality and racism. What solution did Martin Luther King Jr. prop
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

He worked and preached against the violent tension

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What<br> were the goals of the Committee<br> of Public Safety
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

On July 27, 1793, Robespierre was elected to the Committee of Public Safety, which was formed in April to protect France against its enemies, foreign and domestic, and to oversee the government. Under his leadership, the committee came to exercise virtual dictatorial control over the French government.

8 0
2 years ago
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
2 years ago
Why should ethics be a part of invention and discovery??
Aleks04 [339]
<span>Ethics should be a part of invention and discovery because it describes what is good for individuals and to the society. It is a system that concentrates on the welfare of everybody. It involves defending  the concepts of good and bad and  right or wrong conduct. 
If something is to be invented, or something new is discovered, after effects should be discussed whether it brings something good to everyone or not.
</span>

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why the United datares want to temían neutral in the conflit in europe what caused the shift form neutraly to involment in the w
    11·1 answer
  • What are the three main parts of the constitution
    6·1 answer
  • Which pair of man will responsible for arranging the purchase of the Louisiana territory
    5·1 answer
  • When was the Wilmot Proviso first brought up in Congress?
    14·2 answers
  • Who <br> attempted to draft a constitution for Germany
    13·2 answers
  • Which empire had the greatest influence on the development of early Russia?
    15·1 answer
  • Help!!<br> summarize these two theories<br> will give brainliest!!!<br> 10 points!
    12·1 answer
  • The vertices A(–2, –1), B(–3, 2), C(–1, 3), and D(0, 0) form a parallelogram. The vertices A’(–1, –2), B’(2, –3), C’(3, –1), and
    14·2 answers
  • What is President Bush describing here?
    15·2 answers
  • Help w this please !!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!