To answer your question: Rewrite <span>81<span>x2</span></span> as <span><span>(<span>9x</span>)</span>2</span>.<span><span><span>(<span>9x</span>)</span>2</span><span>−49</span></span>Rewrite 49 as <span>72</span>.<span><span><span>(<span>9x</span>)</span>2</span><span>−<span>72</span></span></span> Both terms are perfect squares, factor using the difference of squares formula, <span><span><span>a2</span><span>−<span>b2</span></span></span>=<span><span>(<span>a+b</span>)</span><span>(<span>a<span>−b</span></span>)</span></span></span> where <span>a=<span>9x</span></span> and <span>b=7</span>.<span><span>(<span><span>9x</span>+7</span>)</span><span>(<span><span>9x</span><span>−7</span></span><span>)</span></span></span>
4/5 is greater than 0.75. That is because, if you turn 4/5 into a decimal, them that decimal will be equal to 80/100. 0.75 is 75/100 as a fraction. 80/100 (4/5 simplified) compared to 75/100 is greater. The answer is yes.
Answer: it is
Step-by-step explanation: the next numbers are 1.5, 3, 4.5.
Sry but that’s too much which one would you like help on
Answer
N/A
Step-by-step explanation:
lets take a step into our imaginations, ok?
So when you divide, you're basically splitting the numerator into as many parts as the denominator.
imagine you have a chocolate bar, and it has 6 pieces and you want to split it evenly between your 3 friends.
you split it into three equal parts to get 2 pieces per person.
When you divide 0 by 0, your splitting 0 chocolate bars into 0 equal portions, which is why this problem isn't solvable.
