Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
The law of comparative advantage states that a country will be able to benefit from international trade if it produces and exports the good that it has a comparatively lower opportunity cost in producing.
Comparative advantage refers to comparatively lower opportunity costs. A country will specialize in the production of a good that it can produce at a lower opportunity cost.
Both the countries will be able to benefit from trade and jointly increase their production and consumption if they export goods they can produce at lower opportunity cost and import goods they can produce at higher opportunity cost.
Answer:
total annualized inventory holding and ordering costs = $15,000
Explanation:
total number of orders per year = 120,000 units / 1,200 units per order = 100 orders per year
total ordering cost per year = cost per order x number of orders per year = 100 orders per year x $75 per order = $7,500
average inventory = 1,200 units / 2 = 600 units
annualized inventory holding costs = 600 units x 25% holding cost x $50 cost per unit = $7,500
Answer:
Operating budget
Explanation:
An operating budget is a detailed projection where the company expected its revenue and expenses for a period of time. It is to be prepared at the closing of the year to represent the expected level of the activity during the following year
So as per the given situation, it is the operating budget that contains the revenue details
Answer:
Choose CareCo.
Explanation:
Given : CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees. ApathyInc pays slightly higher wages than CareCo, but does not offer health insurance.
A person who is unhealthy & expects to have high healthcare expenses : would have issues having direct health insurance from an insurer, based on high risk evaluation. Even if by chance, he/ she gets, it will be at extremely high price i.e premium rates & is likely to have less coverage. So, the person rationally would prefer to protect himself / herself from this huge health expenditure risk, & would protect self & family from catastrophic health costs. He / she would do so by choosing to work for Care Co, which gives generous health insurance to all its employees, by sacrifising higher salary by Apathy giving no health insurance. He/ she is logical as the wage differential is likely to be less than catastrophic health costs
