1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mazyrski [523]
3 years ago
14

Evaluate the expression. -3 + (-2)

Mathematics
1 answer:
mart [117]3 years ago
6 0
That's answer exactly is -5
You might be interested in
Which function does NOT represent exponential growth?
Harrizon [31]
Is this multiple choice?

4 0
3 years ago
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
Help!! I hate fractions!! Please tell me the answer ASAP!!
Savatey [412]
Gviusdhvsdiupsndcsdvndsv svudndsufief
7 0
3 years ago
Help a woman out here A
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On monday, deborah ran 3 2/5 miles and on tuesday she ran 4 1/5 miles how many miles did she run on these 2 days togehter
makkiz [27]

7 3/4.

i got this by adding 1/5+2/5=3/4 and then 4+3 which are the whole numbers.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which situation is modeled by the equation 24 = 15x + 8?
    15·1 answer
  • Dayren is driving to visit family. She drives at a average of 65 miles per hour. She drives 227.5 miles before lunch. And then 9
    10·2 answers
  • Brian ran 414 miles in 34 of an hour. How fast was Brian running? 3316 mph 312 mph 5 mph 523 mph
    15·2 answers
  • Can someone help me please
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP! What are the solutions to the system of equations?
    12·1 answer
  • What is 6x+7y=7 in slope intercept form?
    9·1 answer
  • 102 is 126% of what number<br><br> 128.52<br> ≈ 8.10 <br> ≈ 80.95 <br> 12.85
    7·1 answer
  • If the farmer has 648 feet of fencing, what are the dimensions of the region which enclose the maximal area?
    12·1 answer
  • Please can I have an explanation also, I am terrible at these kinds of questions!
    11·1 answer
  • Зе - 19 - 7е + 10<br> I need help with this problem pls l<br>help<br>​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!