The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.
But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
this question needs more support in order to be answered.
A. Foreign
Because its the way the Executive Order Protects The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
Answer:
Since entrepreneurs were usually rich businessmen, they used their money to invest in new inventions. These new inventions created break throughs in the industrial revolution, causing the entrepreneurs to get richer, and invest in other new inventions.
Hope this helps✌️
Answer:
Politics, self expression and the beauty of nature
Explanation:
