Answer:
-2 > -6 . . . or . . . R > S
Step-by-step explanation:
If you plot the temperatures of the two cities on a number line, you see that the temperature for City R is plotted to the right of the temperature for City S. This means the temperature of City S is less than that of City R.
If your inequality relates cities:
S < R or R > S
If your inequality relates temperatures:
-6 < -2 or -2 > -6
Answer:
i think it was about 5000.
Step-by-step explanation:
To get the *percent increase* from week 1 to week 2, we calculate the change in distance from week 1 to week 2 (13.5 - 12.5 = 1 mile) over the week 1 distance (12.5 miles). Doing that, we find that Matthew increased his distance by
1/12.5 = 0.08, or 8%
We’re given that he’ll increase his distance by the same percentage from week 2 to 3, so to find his week 3 distance, we can find 8% of the week 2 distance and add that on. 8% of 13.5 miles is 0.08 x 13.5 = 1.08 miles, so by week 3, he’ll be running 13.5 + 1.08 = 14.58 miles.
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
6 -2 = 4
4 - 3 = 1
1 - .80 = .20
Let
be the length of the rectangle and
be the width. In the problem it is given that
. It is also given that the area
. Substituting in the length in terms of width, we have
. Using the zero product property,
. Solving these we get the width
. However, it doesn't make sense for the width to be negative, so the width must be
. From that we can tell the length
.
