Hi, you've asked an incomplete/unclear question. The full question read;
Which of the phrases below is <u>not</u> in the future perfect continuous?
a) You will have been waiting here for three hours by 8 o'clock.
b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.
c) By the end of next month I will have been living here for ten years.
d) When I finish this course, I will have been learning Italian for ten years.
e) Next month I will have been working here for two years.
Answer:
<u>b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.</u>
Explanation:
We make this conclusion because the phrase <em>"will have been" </em> (which is the future perfect of the verb "to be") is often added to the subject of a sentence to make it future perfect continuous.
However, after careful check of all the sentences, we notice all of them except option b used the future perfect continuous phrase, <em>"will have been." </em>
Answer:
C. Feels
Explanation:
An action verb is a verb that expresses physical or mental action. The action verb tells us what the subject of our clause or sentence is doing-physically or mentally.
Before answering to the question, let us analyze a little bit the meaning of both concepts:
Inferencing is the inner mental ability of reasoning to analyze different situations or problems and to produce a general idea or rule about such situation or problems. This is could be better understood with a little analysis of the Inductive reasoning, but I think it is pretty clear so far.
Inflection refers to the ability of the vocal spectrum to change the tone of words to convey different meaning or purposes.
So, having mentioned the former, the statement that contrast inferencing and inflection is:
Inferencing occurs in the mind and inflection occurs with the voice.
Answer:
"I would do <u>even more</u> good as president."
Explanation:
bad grammar
