1. Over a period of 6 years (from 1980 to 1986) the house gained a value of 12000 dollars (109k-97k). 12000/6 gives you a rate of 2000 dollars per year. Because the initial price at t=0 is 97000, the function is 97000+2000t
Hello, please consider the following.
For the second we will need to put on the same denominator.
Thank you.
Answer:
Option D.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the coordinates of a point which divides the segment XY in the ratio of m : n is (x, y).
Segment X(-4, -9) and Y(4, 7) has been divided in the ratio of 2 : 6.
Therefore, x = ![\frac{[4m+n(-4)]}{m+n}=\frac{8-24}{2+6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5B4m%2Bn%28-4%29%5D%7D%7Bm%2Bn%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B8-24%7D%7B2%2B6%7D)
= -
= -2
and y = ![\frac{[7m+n(-9)]}{m+n}=\frac{14-54}{2+6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5B7m%2Bn%28-9%29%5D%7D%7Bm%2Bn%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B14-54%7D%7B2%2B6%7D)
= 
= -5
Therefore, the point (x, y) is (-2, -5).
Option D. will be the answer.
100/298 = .3355704698 but the answer in a fraction in simplest form is 50/149
Answer:
The answer is the first choice, that the outcomes (getting a 2, 4, or 6 or getting a 1, 3, or 5) are equally likely because the frequencies are close.
Step-by-step explanation:
The second choice isn't true because there isn't a lot of variation. If there was, this would mean they aren't equally likely.
The third choice isn't true because it doesn't make a statement about why the odd/even identity of the sets should affect the likelihood. (Besides, we know they are equally likely.)
The fourth choice isn't true because there is not a lot of difference in the relative frequency.
please give me brainliest
