Something percent of a number must be smaller than the number.
And also, 39% of a number is equal to 39/100 multiplied by the number.
Thus:
39/100 * 1200
39/1 * 12
468
Answer:
Type I: 1.9%, Type II: 1.6%
Step-by-step explanation:
given null hypothesis
H0=the individual has not taken steroids.
type 1 error-falsely rejecting the null hypothesis
⇒ actually the null hypothesis is true⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
but we rejected it ⇒our prediction is the individual has taken steroids.
typr II error- not rejecting null hypothesis when it has to be rejected
⇒actually null hypothesis is false ⇒the individual has taken steroids.
but we didnt reject⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
let us denote
the individual has taken steroids by 1
the individual has not taken steroids.by 0
predicted
1 0
actual 1 98.4% 1.6%
0 1.9% 98.1%
so for type 1 error
actual-0
predicted-1
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.9%=0.019
so for type II error
actual-1
predicted-0
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.6%=0.016
True.
Angle c=anglez
Angle RHC=angle XHZ
Therefore they’re similar.
Pls mark me as the Brainliest as I really need it, thanks!
Answer:
Answers are below
Step-by-step explanation:
12) No because the scale factor is not the same between the two rectangles
13) Yes. TUV is congruent to XYZ. The scale factor is 3/4.
14) Yes. I used SAS to see whether or not the triangles were similar. PQR is congruent to UVW.
15) Yes. I used 14) Yes. I used SAS to see whether or not the triangles were similar. DGH is congruent to FEH.
I think the answer is (7x-3)(7x+3)
