11.5 days, assuming none of the burgers expire before then.
Answer:
B is the correct option.
Explanation:
In theory, the perfect market is the structure in which all the firms sell identical products,They all are price takers, the market share doesn't influence the prices, firms can enter or exit the market without cost and resources are perfectly mobile. No markets are in the sphere of the perfect competition model. so they are classified as imperfect. The imperfect and perfect market is the outcome of post-classical economic thought of the Cambridge tradition.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
1. The current ratio is the sum of current assets divided by current liabilities. It used to measure the ability of the airlines accessories to meet its short term obligation due within a year
Current ratio = $93 million + $85 million + $9 million / $80 million + $26 million
Current ratio = $187 million / $106 million
Current ratio = 1.76:1
Current ratio = 1.76 times
2. Acid test ratio. This measure liquidity but with adjustment for risky current assets i.e Inventory
Acid test ratio = Current assets - Inventories / Current liabilities
Acid test ratio = ($187 million - $173 million) / $106 million
Acid test ratio = $14 million / $106 million
Acid test ratio = 0.13:1
Acid test ratio = 0.13 times
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
§ 351 establishes that businesses shall not recognize any capital gain or loss from property transferred to them in exchange of stocks or partnership share. So the businesses have to record this type of transactions at their fair market value and not their tax basis.
