Steorbord, lit. "side on which a vessel was steered," from steor- "rudder, steering paddle" + bord "ship's side." Cf. O.N. stjornborði, Low Ger. stürbord, Ger. Steuerbord. Early Germanic peoples' boats were propelled and steered by a paddle on the right side. Fr. tribord (O.Fr. estribord), It. stribordo are Gmc. loan-words.
<span>port </span>
<span>Meaning "left side of a ship" is attested from 1543, from notion of "the side facing the harbor" (when a ship is docked). It replaced larboard in common usage to avoid confusion with starboard (q.v.); officially so by Admiralty order of 1844 and U.S. Navy Department notice of 1846. Fig. sense "place of refuge" is attested from 1426; phrase any port in a storm first recorded 1749. </span>
Answer: A. High- High
Explanation: Ethical dissonance as such arises due to inconsistencies in attaining and maintaining a moral image of oneself and being tempted to exploit some unethical situation for the sake of personal gain. In other words, it is the interaction of the company / organisation and the individual with the aim of adapting the individual and the organisation in different possible situations and scenarios. It is a two-way process because the ethics of an individual influences the organisation, simply the individual enters his / her ethics. Also the ethics of the organisation influences the behaviour of the individual.
Of the four possible fit models / options, high-high is one of two fit options that have a high person-organisation fit. So this is a model that provides a fit relationship between the organisation and the individual. When an individual has a high level of ethics, and organisation too, fit with an organisation of course high. That's the case here.
There is another high fit, therefore the agreement of organisations and individuals, but this is not the case here, when a person is of low ethics. Then for that individual it is a high fit of course if it is also a low ethics organisation, such an organisation suits a low ethics individual.
The other two cases of fit are when there is a low level of fit between the organisation and the individual.
Between Italy and Eastern Europe
This question is based off of your own opinion, so I'll give you some basic information and also my opinion.
The Great Compromise was a Compromise between two different plans for the government: The New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan. The main difference between the two is how the states are represented. The Virginia plan wanted states to have votes proportional to their population in Congress. The New Jersey wanted all states to have equal votes.
In the end, they compromised by saying the Senate would follow the New Jersey plan, and the House of Representatives, the Virginia plan. The Senate would have more power than the House of Representatives.
Personally, I think the Great Compromise created a functional and fair representative Congress, because it gave all states a voice in Congress, and didn't give some lots more power than others. It also gave the people some power with the Virginia plan, with the Representatives being based off of population.
A a megalopolis .. a group of two or more roughly adjacent metropolitan areas,