1,700 i found the answer on a quizlet
Answer:
attacked or assaulted property rights.
Explanation:
After the civil war, the supreme court held the idea that any government regulation (especially economic regulation) denied private businesses of their property rights and liberties, which constituted a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed equal and legal rights to all US citizens (businesses were included as citizens) and guaranteed that no government (state or federal) shall deny any citizen of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
We have to remember that these were sensible times and the supreme court tried to protect the newly given rights specially to African Americans, but sometimes business people are very capable of using ideological trends in their favor.
The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
Answer:
10.29%
Explanation:
Rule of 72 can be defined as a metric used to determine the time it will take to double an investment based on its growth rate.
To find the interest rate Kari must receive for her investment to double in 7 years, we would use the Rule of 72;
Rule of 72 = 72/7
Rule of 72 = 10.29%
Therefore, Kari must receive an interest rate of 10.29% for her investment to double in 7 years.
