Answer:
Option A Risks affecting the business operations and potential outcomes of an organization's activities.
Explanation:
The reason is that the business risk are those risks that has potential to increase the cost of the company or decrease the revenue of the organization. So here the misstatement will not increase the cost of the organization and the only risk that increase the cost or decrease the revenues is the poor performance of the organization's activities and operations. So the right option which doesn't talks about misstatements is option A.
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
A competitive advantage is an advantage an individual, organization or country has over its competitors. That competitive advantage can be a comparative advantage when the entity has found a way to implement lower opportunity costs in its production process or a differential advantage if the firm provides a product or service with a unique feature difficult to replicate by competitors.
Answer:
$68,475
Explanation:
Data provided
Sales in October = $249,000
Credit percentage = 55%
Following month percentage = 50%
The calculation of accounts receivable is shown below:-
Credit sales in October = $249,000 × 55%
= $136,950
Collection collected in October
= $136,950 × 50%
= $68,475
Therefore, for computing the collection collected in October we simply multiply the credit sales in October with following month percentage.
The Taylor salesperson is using the referral method to deal with objections.
A referral is a way of dealing with objections in which the speaker refers to a previous experience to object to what another person has told him about a topic.
In the case presented, the manager of the golf club was expressing his concern about the opinion of golfers about Taylor clubs that had a special characteristic on their center of gravity.
To counter this argument, the seller refers to a real case of a buyer who was left with very good impressions of the Taylor stick.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1342578
Answer:
Collaborative or cooperative intellectual property.
Explanation:
A strong Intellectual Property position "facilitates open collaboration when talking with partners about the technologies that need to be developed. In other sectors manufacturing technology can be shared with contract manufacturers, others may cross licence to access broader portfolios and indeed many companies may pool and share their IP in order to develop interoperability standards."
Reference: Duncan, “Intellectual Property and the Business Model.” Ipstrategy.com, 28 Nov. 2012
