<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
6800*.64= 4352
Ernesto payed $ 4352 in tax
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
because the organization must know how much they own
Answer:
c. measures changes in quantity demanded more accurately than elasticity.
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, slope measures changes in quantity demanded very accurately compared to elasticity. The main for this reason is that m, slope and elasticity are not the same concepts. Slope evaluates the
flatness or steepness of a line in terms of the evaluating units for price and quantity, while elasticity evaluates the relative response of quantity to changes in price.
Answer:
a. 6.7%
b. 12.0%
Explanation:
a. DDM
Dividende Discount Method is used to calculate the price of the stock using Dividend, rate of return and growth rate.
Return on equity = [ Dividend x ( 1 + growth rate ) / Price of stock ] + Growth Rate
Return on equity = [ $0.5 x ( 1 + 6% ) / $76 ] + 6%
Return on equity = [ $0.5 x ( 1.06 ) / $76 ] + 0.06
Return on equity = 6.7%
b. SML
Security Market line method uses calculates the cost of capital using following formula
Re = R
f + β ( Rm − R
f )
Rf = Risk free rate
β = stock beta
Rm = Market rate
Re =Expected rate
Re = 5.9% + 1.20 ( 11% - 5.9% )
Re = 12.02%
