1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olganol [36]
3 years ago
9

Why was Jesus threating to the romans

History
2 answers:
IrinaVladis [17]3 years ago
6 0

The romans saw Jesus as someone that could takeover and become more important than them. He would overpower them and make them lose their position as kings and rulers

Ymorist [56]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:is jesus, jesus loves everyone including the romans and jesus is a good person if you dont understand go to the bible in romans

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What were the immediate conflicts and deeper causes that led the united states and the soviet union to go from being allies to b
aleksley [76]
Immediate conflicts:
... The USA had atomic weapons and the USSR did not.  (The US would not share that technology with the Soviets.)
... The USSR did not assure that free and fair elections took place in Eastern Europe -- it saw to it that Soviet-aligned governments were installed there.
... Tensions over the East Germany / West Germany and East Berlin / West Berlin division of territory.

Deeper causes:
The USA was committed to capitalism and democratic institutions of government.
The USSR was committed to communism and imposed authoritarian government.
The Cold War was mostly a tension between these worldviews.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the importance of cuban missile crisis?
Lapatulllka [165]
The Cuban Missile Crisis, October 1962. The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War and was the moment when the two superpowers came closest to nuclear conflict.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the French and Indian war lead to tensions between England and her 13 colonies ??????? Plz
Mrrafil [7]
French and Indian war (also known as the seven years war), led tensions between the 13 colonies and Britian. This is because in this war france lost New France to the British. When taxes began to rise in the colonies and Americans were starting to rebel, French were happy to help since it would be a sort of revenge since losing their colony in North America.
4 0
2 years ago
Match the following items. 1. Germany and Austria-Hungary Bismarck 2. Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary Dual Alliance 3. Iron
Nataliya [291]

<u>Let's match each term or expression with its definition</u>

  • Germany and Austria-Hungary: Dual Alliance. It was a defensive alliance founded in 1879, that became part of the system of alliances developed by Bismarck, in order to prevent that Germany got involved in a war.
  • Germany, Italy, and Austria-Hungary - Triple Alliance. It was an agreement signed by Germany, Italy and Austria-Hungary, in 1882. It was renewed periodically until they got involved together in WWI, and the agreeement finally expired when the alliance was defeated by the Allied powers.
  • Iron Chancellor: Bismarck. Otto von Bismarck (1815 – 1898) governed German international and European affairs between the 1860s and 1890s. He subsquently became the first Chancellor of the German Empire. He was in office betwee 1871 and 1890.
  • Divine right German emperor: Wilhelm. Wilhelm II (1859 – 1941) was the last Kaiser (Emperor) of the German Empire. He abdicated in 1918, right before Germany's defeat in WWI became official.
  • Title for emperor in Germany: Kaiser. The term Kaiser means emperor in German. It was used to refer to the rightful rulers of the German Empire and the Austrian Empire, and it was an inherited title.
6 0
3 years ago
Two events are said to be correlated if:
shepuryov [24]

Answer: the correct answer is C) one of them did not actually cause the other to occur.

Explanation: a correlation between variables, however, does not automatically indicates that the change in one variable is the reason or the cause of the change in the values of the other variable. Causation indicates that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; i.e. there is a causal linkage between the two events.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In his work Summa Theologica, who concluded that there is no conflict between faith and reason?
    11·2 answers
  • How did trade networks in the post classical era compare to the classical era?
    9·1 answer
  • Did your opinion reflect the majority or minority opinion on each case?
    11·2 answers
  • Prior to the French Revolution, which class has the most people but the least political power?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did women take the lead with the boycotts against england prior to the war against?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the Egyptian priests welcome the Kings of Kush?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the senate's vote of censure against mccarthy?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the result of the struggle between the nationlist party and the communist party in china
    5·1 answer
  • In which part of Europe would the Renaissance initially gain strength and eventually start to spread
    7·1 answer
  • Sometimes African civilizations were able to successfully resist European imperialism. One example would be the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!