To illustrate that the list that McCandless had made was supported by actions as well as words, as shown in option D.
<h3>What is the effect of this description?</h3>
- It increases the reader's feelings about the characters' intentions.
- It optimizes the understanding of McCandess' image.
- Characterizes the characters indirectly.
When Krakauer describes McCandless's image of himself, he promotes a greater understanding of McCandless's list and shows himself as a character who likes to analyze the actions of others very accurately. It also shows that McCandless is a very proactive character who speaks and acts on his words.
This attitude is efficient to explain the characters and indirectly characterizes them.
Learn more about indirect characterization:
brainly.com/question/12003614
#SPJ1
Jonny came back to cause trouble and to haunt France.
Answer:
An ethical appeal is a method of persuasion that's based on the author's credibility. It's one of the three appeals that Aristotle identified as the most effective tools of persuasive writing or speaking. The other two are logical appeals and emotional appeals.
Sentence 3 supports the main idea of the passage the least because it doesn’t even mention anything about the women in their family, it definitely talks about women and their active ness in politics, but it doesn’t have anything to do with the women in their family whereas all the other sentences do.
Hope this helps!
I think it is 1. "in the years without rainfall"
