Answer:
helping employees execute strategy successfully.
knowing what's going on at all levels of the organization.
making sure results are strategy-oriented.
Explanation:
The actions where the top executives result in the strategy execution process involves the employees for helping to execute the strategy in a successful manner. Also we are aware what things are going on at all levels i.e. top, middle and bottom. In addition to this, the results that comes should be strategy-orinted
Therefore the above 3 statements should be considered
Answer:
External cost
Explanation:
External cost is a cost that is gotten from any economic transaction, in which the person or entity bearing the cost is not directly involved in. They are also known as spill over costs. The offensive odor in the question has generated an external cost at different locations from the site, the cost of rent differs. External costs usually have negative effects, from our question we can see that the odor from the landfill site must be intolerable for people residing in the area.
Answer:
Motivation
Explanation:
<em>Motivation in work is when employees are incentivized due to their good performance</em>, this happens when they provide the company a greater value. There are two kinds of motivation:
- Internal: it includes emotions and thoughts, <em>in the exercise given this internal motivation is letting the team know that they are doing good</em>
- External: includes salary and work environment, <em>in the case given the bonuses are the external motivation</em>
I hope you find this information is useful and interesting! Good luck!
Answer:
Joel is behaving in a totally unprofessional & unethical manner
Explanation:
As assistant controller, Joel Kimmel's job specification & responsibility includes financial statement preparation & combination, putting of internal controls in place, detailed analysis & reporting of cost variance, acts as the go-between with external auditors amongst other such responsibilities.
As such, when Joel discovered the cost discrepancy during the reconciliation, it was actually his responsibility to call the bank's attention to the variance. This is something that clearly falls under his job specification & can be considered as neglect of duty. Joel's decision defeats the very purpose of bank reconciliation, which is to correct any such discrepancy & to the ensure the rectification of transactions. Most importantly, the decision Joel plans to take is very unethical & is against standard accounting practices
We can therefore, say that Joel's decision is thoroughly unethical & unprofessional
