1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lana [24]
2 years ago
13

Search online to find at least two articles that have opposite opinions on the repeated breeding of pedigree dogs. Does one arti

cle seem more scientifically credible than the other? Explain your answer.
Biology
2 answers:
erik [133]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A veterinarian wrote an article stating his disapproval of some of the tactics used to breed pedigree dogs. He stated that pedigree dogs can be healthy, but because of inbreeding, they’re more likely to have health problems than other dogs. The author supported his statement with scientific studies.

A breeder with 20 years of experience wrote an article that was pro-breeding. He talked about his own success and shared his opinions on proper breeding techniques. Because the veterinarian used scientific facts to support his reasoning, his article seemed more scientifically credible to me.

Explanation:

SOVA2 [1]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:Advantage: Artificial selection could eliminate certain genetic diseases that will make organisms healthier.

Disadvantage: The traits that pass on to offspring may not be the most beneficial for the organism to survive in the wild. These are traits that people desire, and they’re suitable mostly for a domestic setting.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
N which vertebrates did feathers first evolve?
Lapatulllka [165]
<span>Wings have evolved several times independently. In flying fish, the wings are formed by the enlargement of the pectoral fins. Some fish leap out of the water and glide through the air, both to save energy and to escape predators. If they were already gliding, then any mutation that would result in an increase of the gliding surface would be advantageous to the fish that has it. These advantageous may allow these fish to out-compete the others. 

Wings have also evolved in bats, pterosaurs, and birds. In these animals, the wings are formed by the forelimbs. In some lizards that have evolved gliding flight, however, the "wings" or gliding surfaces may be quite different. The lizard Draco, for example, has gliding surfaces formed by an extension of the ribs. A number of extinct reptiles have similar gliding surfaces. Frogs that glide have expanded webbing on their hands and feet. Gliding ("flying") squirrels and marsupial sugar gliders have flaps of skin that lie between the front and rear limbs. These gliding animals all have one thing in common: a gliding surface that is formed by enlarging some parts of the body. 

In pterosaurs, the wing is formed by an elongated finger and a large skin membrane attached to this finger. In bats, the wing is formed by the entire hand, with skin membranes connecting the elongated fingers. In birds, flight feathers are attached to the entire forelimb, while the fingers have fused together. In all of these animals except birds, the wing is a solid structure. In birds, however, the wing is formed by a large number of individual feathers lying close to each other and each feather is in turn formed by filaments that interlock. 

Biophysicists have determined that flight most likely evolved from the tree down. That means most active flyers evolved flight from an animal that was already gliding. Gliding was therefore probably an indispensable intermediate stage in the evolution of flight. Since gliding has evolved in so many different groups of animals, it follows that the ancestors of birds, bats, and pterosaurs were almost certainly gliders. 

Unfortunately, the fossil records of the immediate gliding ancestors of birds, bats, and pterosaurs are all missing. The first known bat and bird fossils are recognizable as flyers. The same is true of pterosaurs. Therefore the origin of these flyers remain a mystery and a subject of often acrimonious debate. There are people who claim that dinosaurs evolved insulation, which then evolved into feathers, but the evidence for that is lacking. The so-called proto-feathers found on some dinosaurs are indistinguishable from the collagen fibers found in the skin of most vertebrates. Some of the supposedly feathered dinosaurs, such as Caudipteryx and Protarchaeopteryx, are actually flightless birds. The same is probably true of Microraptor fossils, which are (as Alan Feduccia says) probably "avian non-dinosaurs." 

Even though the immediate ancestor of birds remains a mystery, there is a fossil known as Longisquama insignis, which lived during the late Triassic. It has featherlike structures on its back. It was probably a glider of some sort. So, this animal may well be the distant ancestor of Archaeopteryx, the oldest known bird. 

In sum, flying almost certainly evolved from animals that were already gliding, or from the tree down, not from the ground up. The dinosaurian origin of birds requires that dinosaurs evolved feathers from insulation and flight to have evolved from the ground up. Both of these requirements are extremely unlikely to have occurred in evolutionary history, because dinosaurs are almost certainly ectothermic (or "cold-blooded") and therefore they never evolved insulation, and because feathers are too unnecessarily complex to have evolved as insulation. Flight from the ground up is also dangerous because large animals that attempt to fly from the ground may crash and seriously injure or even kill themselves. We all know how dangerous an airplane can be if it loses power and crashes. Small and light weight animals, OTOH, that were already gliding can survive if their attempt to fly fails. Finally, if flight evolved from gliding, then why do animals glide? The answer is that gliding is energetically much cheaper than to descend a tree, walk along the ground, and then climb up another tree. Besides, it is almost certainly much safer to glide from one tree to another than to be walking on the ground for many arboreal animals. 

See link below for details of why dinosaurs are considered ectothermic according to the available scientific evidence.</span>Source(s):<span>http://discovermagazine.com/1996/dec/aco...</span>
3 0
3 years ago
1. Excretion is the process of (1 point)
ycow [4]
Q1. The answer is removing metabolic wastes from the body.
Excretion is the process through which metabolic wastes are removed from the body. Skin, lungs, and greatly kidney, which are the part of the excretory system, are responsible for excretion of metabolic waste in vertebrates. Invertebrates have special systems (insects, for example, have Malpighian tubules) or use skin to excrete metabolic wastes while single-celled organisms use the whole surface of the cell.

Q2. The answer is some animals live in dry or salty environments.
Kidneys are important organs in maintaining water balance. Some animals that live in dry and salty environments must preserve water in order to maintain homeostasis. They drink and eat food with more salt in it. If they lose that precious water in such conditions, the amount of different salts in the organism will increase and it will affect a normal functioning of the organism.

Q3. The answer is simple diffusion across the skin. 
Ammonia is very toxic substance and a lot of water is needed for its neutralisation and excretion. Therefore, animals that live in water excrete ammonia directly in the water. Many freshwater invertebrates eliminate ammonia through skin. In animals that do not live in the water, kidneys and liver help conversion of ammonia into urea which is then excreted.,

Q4. They both actively pump salt across their gills. 
Both saltwater and freshwater fishes use gills to eliminate nitrogenous wastes while kidneys have a little role in the elimination of this kind of the waste. Salt that is lost is replaced by active transport of salt ions into the body by the gills.

Q5. The answer is They both convert nitrogenous wastes to uric acid. 
A garden spider and a sparrow are terrestrial organisms. They do not live in the water and do not excrete metabolic wastes in the water. It is known that ammonia is toxic nitrogenous substance and a lot of water is needed for its excretion. For water organisms this is not a problem, they are surrounded by water, but terrestrial organisms, such as the garden spider and the sparrow, have no such amount of water in the environment, so their kidneys and liver must convert ammonia into urine which can then easily be excreted.
8 0
3 years ago
When using a dichotomous key, it is important to always
sashaice [31]

Answer: answer is C

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please Help (will give brainly)
Vaselesa [24]
C is the answer.We are using to classify organisms beyond molecular setting not by the physical structure.note-applicable for this question only
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how do the hypothalamus and pituitary gland interact to control the release of the some of the hormones in the endocrine system
blagie [28]

Answer:

Your hypothalamus communicates with the anterior pituitary lobe via hormones and the posterior lobe through nerve impulses. Through the stalk.

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Members of one kind of organism in an ecosystem
    10·1 answer
  • You are preparing an injection of a narcotic to relieve a pregnant woman's pain. as you are about to give it, she asks you for a
    8·1 answer
  • What were the first artificial christmas trees made from
    14·1 answer
  • Astronomers believe that the _____ the star, the _____ its lifespan.
    15·1 answer
  • Emily went to the river and collected small water sample. when she returned home she place a drop of water on a microscope, whic
    11·1 answer
  • The amount of water that evaporates from earth is _____.
    10·1 answer
  • ________ is the physical and mechanical actions of chewing.
    5·1 answer
  • This diagram shows a red blood cell in a beaker that contains a solution with a
    12·1 answer
  • What is mentruation? give example​
    11·1 answer
  • Which factors contributed to the additions of the modern cell theory
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!