1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elanso [62]
3 years ago
13

Who´s take a political decision

Law
1 answer:
Levart [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

One of the main models is the rational choice model, which is based on the idea that the individual actors in the decision-making process act rationally and are trying to achieve their own aims in competition with one another. We will concentrate on this model later in this section.

You might be interested in
Is the illegal use of another author's material without permission or citation.
kari74 [83]

Answer:

D) plagiarism

Explanation:

Plagiarism is when you use someone else's work and say its your own. To avoid plagiarism, always cite where you found your research from and use quotations when quoting someone. If you need to use someone else's work then ask permission. If your making money off of someone else's work then you need to pay the person you copied from. Plagiarism can mean jail time and is considered a serious offense.

3 0
3 years ago
30 POINTS!!!!!! PLEASE HELP ME
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

not sure might be he acquired the entire oregon territory from great britain

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in the context of proving actual malice in a defamation lawsuit, reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of a statement is p
Nookie1986 [14]

Actual malice is the legal requirement imposed on specific defamation plaintiffs when filing a lawsuit for libel or slander, and will be found where a defendant publishes or communicates a false statement with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its veracity.

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
The 5th Amendment had an impact on Miranda V. Arizona.<br> O True<br> O False
SashulF [63]

Answer:

true, i think

Explanation:

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Meanings of the following please
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

A. Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs

B. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination

C. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology

D. Scientific Working Group for the Forensic Analysis of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Terrorism

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who may become members of state professional organizations?
    7·2 answers
  • What does recession mean
    7·1 answer
  • What is one thing the Federal Government system can do to ease Mass Incarceration?
    5·1 answer
  • Parole officers are responsible for monitoring the activities of parolees; offenders recently released from prison. Traditionall
    13·1 answer
  • "Did the appellate court agree with the trial court's order that Case Western must issue a diploma to Amir Al-Dabagh
    10·1 answer
  • Title VIII of the Education Act of 1972 prohibits gender discrimination in all elementary and secondary schools, colleges, and u
    9·1 answer
  • In which subjects are people who want to become citizens of the United States tested as part of the naturalization process?
    15·1 answer
  • The diffrense between self-confidence and self-esteem​
    14·1 answer
  • .How can I get<br> campaign funds?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a precipitin test? What is it used for?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!