<span>If not all the facts have been discovered about a civilisation, society or event, historians have a difficult task describing it accurately and making sense of everything that happened.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
By Tom Jawetz July 22, 2019, 4:45 am
Restoring the Rule of Law Through a Fair, Humane, and Workable Immigration System
Getty/Mario Tama
New U.S. citizens gather at a naturalization ceremony, March 2018.
OVERVIEW
Policymakers must break free of the false dichotomy of America as either a nation of immigrants or a nation of laws, and advance an immigration system that is fair, humane, and actually works.
PRESS CONTACT
For more information and updates on this topic, see CAP’s series: “Reframing the Immigration Debate.”
Introduction and summary
The immigration debate in America today is nearly as broken as the country’s immigration system itself. For too many years, the conversation has been predicated on a false dichotomy that says America can either honor its history and traditions as a nation of immigrants1 or live up to its ideals as a nation of laws by enforcing the current immigration system.2 Presented with this choice,3 supporters of immigration—people who recognize the value that immigrants bring to American society, its culture, and its economy, as well as the important role that immigrants play in the nation’s continued prosperity—have traditionally seized the mantle of defending America as a nation of immigrants.4 By doing this, however, rather than challenging the dichotomy itself, supporters have ceded powerful rhetorical ground to immigration restrictionists, who are happy to masquerade as the sole defenders of America as a nation of laws.5 The fundamental problem with this debate is that America is, and has always been, both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Debates over a liberal immigration policy actually predate the start of the nation itself; they infused the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, America’s founding document.6
GET THE LATEST ON IMMIGRATION
Email
<span>When the Supreme Court reviewed whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act was legal under the Constitution, the power that the Court was using is the </span><span>judicial review.The </span>Supreme Court's major powers is the power to review laws. This is to determine their legality under the Constitution.
A. <span>blamed the urban riots on segregation and poverty.
The "Kerner Commission" as it was often called, after its chairman, Otto Kerner, Jr., the governor of Illinois, was officially the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. President Lyndon Johnson appointed the 11-member panel in July, 1967. The "R</span>eport of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders," often simply termed the "Kerner Report<span>," was completed by the end of February, 1968. The report was an indictment of white racism and racial segregation that pointed to extreme lack of economic opportunity for black Americans.</span>
Answer:
Jacksonian democracy was a 19th-century political philosophy in the United States that expanded suffrage to most white men over the age of 21, and restructured a number of federal institutions.
Explanation:
