There are several ways in which we could justify this statement, but also many ways in which we would be able to challenge it.
In terms of support, we can argue that this was the case because the cultures of America did not have any significant contact with the cultures of Africa or Oceania until the arrival of the Europeans. We can also support this by the fact that the Andean cultures and the Mesoamerican cultures had no contact with each other.
However, there are several factors that show that this was not the case, or that the claim might be exaggerated. For example, we know that many groups in Africa had extensive interactions with each other. For example, the expansion of the Bantu that took place over large regions in Africa. Another challenge could be the extensive contact that many Mesoamerican groups had with each other.
Lateral moraine would be the most useful for tracing valuable gold deposits back to their bedrock source area?
Answer:
Philosophical Empiricism
Explanation:
The philosophy of empiricism found its root in the Greek and Roman perception of word where Greek means it experience and for Romans its skills or practical experience. And Aristotle suggested that people understand this world through experience, observation, and evidence. All the knowledge acquired by people came through sensed and they rejected every other theory to perceive reality.
This would be true
a lot of times people can be pressured into doing things they normally wouldn't do, even if they know it's wrong
