Answer:
An exception based on public policy.
Explanation:
Employment at will according to the United States is a doctrine that permits the employer and employee to work together in an indefinite period of time, whereas they are able to terminate their contract with any necessary fair clause.
In many counties around the world, employers always look for reasons to terminate or stop their employees from working, whereas an exception based on public policy negate this doctrine.
Answer:
total product costs = $101750
Explanation:
given data
overhead costs = $ 100
Direct materials of $41,000
direct manufacturing labor = 450
per hour = $35
markup rate = 30 %
solution
we get here total product costs that is express as
total product costs = Direct materials + DML + MOH ..........1
total product costs = $41,000 + ( 450 × $35 ) + ( 450 × $100 )
total product costs = $41,000 + $15750 + $45000
total product costs = $101750
Answer:
a. How much time would it take the two to complete the project if they divide the calculations equally and the slides equally? Briefly discuss.
Brian: 5 hours for PowerPoint and 5 hours for the calculations, total 10 hours.
Debbie: 10 hours for PowerPoint and 6 hours for the calculations, total 16 hours.
In total they would spend 26 hours combined.
If they divide the work equally, they will spend too much time.
b. How much time would it take the two to complete the project if they use comparative advantage and specialize in calculating or preparing slides? Briefly discuss
Brian will spend 10 hours doing PowerPoint slides and Debbie will spend 12 hours doping calculations. Total time spent 22 hours. By specializing they will save 4 hours.
c. If Brian and Debbie have the same opportunity cost of $5 per hour, is there a better solution than for each to specialize in calculating or preparing slides? Briefly discuss
Yes, Debbie could pay $50 to Brian so that he does everything in 20 hours. That way they can save 2 more hours.
Answer:
The world has limited productive resources
More output satisfies More wants
Answer:
1. Damaged or obsolete goods are not counted in inventory if they cannot be sold.
2. If these can be sold… Cost should be reduced to Net Realizable Value
Explanation:
The law relating to the valuation of inventory is that ''inventory should be valued at lower of 'Cost' and 'Net Realizable Value'.
Therefore in the case of damaged or obsolete goods, they have to be eliminated from inventory, otherwise it will lead to overvaluation.
However in the case where these can be sold, They have to be valued at lower of 'cost' or 'salable value', implying that 'Cost' should be reduced to 'Net Realizable Value'
