Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
Adolf Hitler’s plan to mass-exterminate "undesirable" peoples, is the right answer.
During the Second World War, the Final Solution was a plan of Nazis for the genocide of Jews population. The "Final Solution to the Jewish question" was a code for the mass slaughter of all Jews within the reach of the Nazis. This solution was not confined to the European continent. This policy of voluntary and well-organised genocide beginning across Europe under the occupation of Germany was formed in procedural and geopolitical courses by Nazi influence in January 1942. As a result of this solution, the world witnessed the mass killing of 90 per cent of the total Jews population.
The effect that the use of biblical allusions have had on those who were listening to john winthrop's sermon "a model of christian charity" was that it helped the listeners see that their situation was similar to that of the ancient israelites; they, like the israelites, needed to obey god's commandments by loving god and one anothe
<h3>What was the Model of Christian Charity?</h3>
It articulated the God's high expectations for the settlement and explains the consequences of failure. His sermon was designed to unite the settlers by giving them a common goal and a common fate if they failed to achieve that goal.
His sermon urges his fellow Puritans not only to love God and one another, but "to walk in His ways and to keep His Commandments and His ordinance and His laws, and the articles of our Covenant with Him."
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Christian Charity
brainly.com/question/28151641
#SPJ1
Answer:
Steppe nomads would invade the settled communities to take control of pasture lands. Settled communities were in the fear of new or next invasion. The nomad's trade was not related to the gain but related to the goods provided themselves that they don't have that time Nomads were from two different cultures and districts.
Nomads speak a Turkic language. There were many nomads group who traveled on the silk road.
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
I would say the answer is A. Dimitri made the modern periodic table, not chemical symbols, and generally compounds do not have the same properties, for example water which is made of 2 gases.
