Answer:
Historical costs is objectively and precisely measured, whereas market values can be difficult to estimate, and different analysts would come up with different
values.
Explanation:
In preparing a balance sheet it is customary for a company to value the assets and other items based on historical costs rather than market values.
For example if an asset is purchased at $20,000, this value will reflect in the balance sheet in subsequent years. Or future calculation will be based on this.
Let's say yearly depreciation is $1,000 then after on year the value will be $19,000, after two years $18,000 and so on.
This is more object than market value which varies at any one time.
Market value for an item will vary depending on location and the market.
Answer: The value of this exchange is $8,816.05.
Explanation:
The problem is dealing with a simple case of arbitrage of exchange rates: Lets assume that
k = koruna
b = baht
Step 1:
Sales Revenue = k2,200,000
(To get USD amount : 
Purchase Cost = b3,200,000
(To get USD amount : 
Step 2:
Profit = Sales Revenue - Purchase cost
= $86,750.7886 - $77,934.7297
= $8,816.0589
The value of this exchange is $8,816.05.
Answer:
Economic order quantity (EOQ)= 49 units
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Demand= 480 units per year
Order cost= $10
Holding cost= 10*0.4= $4
<u>Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the ideal order quantity a company should purchase to minimize inventory costs such as holding costs, shortage costs, and order costs.</u>
Economic order quantity (EOQ)= √[(2*D*S)/H]
D= Demand in units
S= Order cost
H= Holding cost
Economic order quantity (EOQ)= √[(2*480*10) / 4]
Economic order quantity (EOQ)= √(2,400)
Economic order quantity (EOQ)= 49 units
Answer:
b. Nina will prefer L to M.
Explanation:
Convex utility of wealth indicates that an individual tends to be comfortable with taking risks.
A concave utility function shows an aversion for risk.
A mean preserving spread occurs when one variable has greater variance than another but they both have the same mean.
In the given scenario prospect L will have a greater variance than prospect M since it is a mean preserving spread.
Given Nina's risk taking preference she will most likely take prospect L that offers more variability over prospect M
