Answer:
Option A, Conquest, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The term culture diffusion is used to refer to the spread of a particular cultural belief and social activities of a group of people to another. Culture diffusion can take place through many different ways such as conquest, technology, religion, migration etc. As a result, the people of different areas, ethnicities, nationalities and religions share common culture sometimes.
The culture diffusion that spread due to the victory of one country in war is called cultural diffusion through conquest. It is so because prior to the war the people of the defeated country had their own culture to follow but after their conquest, the culture of the winner country spread throughout the defeated nation.
Answer:
omni-channel shoppers
Explanation:
Omni - channel shoppers -
These are the type of people , who shop from all the available sources possible , is referred to as omni - channel shoppers.
The sources can be online as well as offline , by comparing the prices for better deal.
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
Tasha is a omni-channel shopper.
He was very smart and was an inventor. He invented stuff like Lightning rods and Biofoclas
Answer:A self-report inventory
Explanation:A self-report inventory is psychological test which gives someone a survey or questions in form of a questionnaire which they need to fill with or without the help of a researcher. Self report inventory works with asking direct question which ask someone about their values , interests and personality types. In this test there is no objective answer because it is based on personal test.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
