<span>The major political concern that rose was that the king took decisions that affected the colonies and wouldn't let them take part in the important decisions. Simply put, this is the no taxation without representation that everyone was talking about.</span>
The state delegates met in 1787 to imagine a new constitution for their country. For 6 years, the American territory was organized under the articles of confederation. These articles gave all powers to states that could follow their laws. But, the national congress could not intervene. This policy had been put in place because the citizens of the United States had a great need for freedom after being dominated for years by the British kings.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
They thought that strong central power was not needed and that states would naturally want to work together. However, this prediction was false. The articles of the confederation did not work very long and conflicts between the states developed. The problems were mainly economic because the states did not all want to give money to congress. Since this institution had almost no power, it could not negotiate with other countries which weakened the position of the United States in the world. Finally, serious social problems erupt within the states, because of the devaluation of the dollar and the debt to be paid after the war against Great Britain. It made the governments had no money for their people.
The debates in 1787 were long and complicated because of all about what powers to give to congress. But in the end, the supporters of a strong institution above the states were a majority, and an innovative democratic system emerged in North America.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Ratification of US Constitution: brainly.com/question/1218366
- The New Jersey Plan: brainly.com/question/5956921
- The 17th amendment: brainly.com/question/1810100
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Subject: History
Chapter: The birth of the United States of America
Keywords: the articles of confederation, the US Constitution, the constitutional convention of 1787, the political system in the United States
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
Answer:
1. I think it would limit, but not end.
2. They threaten with military force, and mobilizing national guard.
3. Smartphones can be used to expose racism- especially phone cameras. News outlets can report videos captured by citizens by playing it and reporting the event's whereabouts.
Please brainliest
