1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
REY [17]
3 years ago
5

What is important when looking at historical sources?

History
2 answers:
natulia [17]3 years ago
4 0
Credibility is the answer.

madam [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

credibility

Explanation:

i got it right

You might be interested in
3. What effect did Napoleon I have on the Holy Roman Empire?
Alona [7]

Napoleon defeated the Holy Roman Empire, and because of that, Francis II (The Holy Roman Emperor) Was removed of his throne.

3 0
3 years ago
Who aligned themselves with the colonists after the Battle of Saratoga?
Bingel [31]

Answer:so easy 2

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which Fascist leader was called "Il Duce" by his followers?
matrenka [14]
Benito Mussolini was called Il Duce by his followers. I believe it meant "The Leader" in Italian, just like "Der Fuher" means "The Leader" in German, and was a title given to Adolf Hitler.
8 0
3 years ago
If the 19th century science was defined by certainty, and what ways do these documents undermine that certainty? Do any of these
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

If 19th-century science is defined by certainty, the experiments with advanced technology and the scientific studies would have been the poof of certainty.

19th century was a period when many ideas, theories and inventions were developing. This era was also known as a modern era of science. The result of the discovering and experimenting would have been recorded in the Journal, some of them still exist. So, there wouldn't have been any loss, whatever the scientists were putting forward were seen in the public. Some of the examples are the Steam Engine, Charles Darwin Theories, telegraph and telephone, medicines.

7 0
3 years ago
What if Connecticut and rhode island each have their own currency
levacccp [35]

If Connecticut and Rhode island each have their own currency, then it would be more difficult to trade and enact federal monetary policy.

<h3>What happens if states have their own currencies?</h3>

If states like Connecticut and Rhode island had their own currencies, it would lead to a situation where trade between the two states is harder because the currencies would have to be converted before they are used to trade. This might reduce the volume of trade between the two states if the process is difficult.

Connecticut and Rhode island having their own currencies would also make it difficult for the Federal Reserve to enact a unified monetary policy that is based on the U.S. Dollar which would make it harder to manage the economy.

Find out more on monetary policy at brainly.com/question/13926715

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ultimately, what led to the colonies' victory in the american revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • How were the Iroquois and Cherokee similar?
    10·1 answer
  • What type of government did spain have in the 1600s?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help i don’t know this!!
    6·1 answer
  • Compare the lifestyle of the Hunter gatherers with those of settlers of early agriculture communities. The neolithic revolution
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these were effects of the factory system for consumers? Check all that apply. lower prices wider variety fewer stores m
    8·2 answers
  • What was the Battle of the Atlantic, and how did the Allies win it ?
    6·1 answer
  • 4. In what ways did the American financial sector and American businessmen
    9·1 answer
  • भोजपत्र एक प्रकारको लेकाली जातको रुखको ...... हो ।​
    6·1 answer
  • __design reduces drag by shaping parts in various ways
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!