Answer:
Exaptation
Explanation:
Exaptation:
it is referred to the process through which features acquire some unique function for which they are not meant for.
The fine example of Exaptation is Feather:
it has been mentioned and recorded from fossil record there are the ancestors of today's modern bird that are flightless but later in future, they adapt flight as an instrumental part of their life>
<span>Littoral zones are more likely to contain vegetation than riparian zones. The statement presented is False. A r</span>iparian zone<span> or </span>riparian area<span> is the interface between land and a </span>river<span> or </span>stream<span>. </span>Riparian<span> is also the proper nomenclature for one of the fifteen terrestrial </span>biomes<span> of the earth.</span>
<span>Subcultural deviance theory is
most consistent with <u>normative ethics</u>. Normative ethics deals with the
questions that arise when considering how a person acts or suppose to act. The specific
ethics of subculture deviance theory is the non utilitarianism. In this system,
a group of individuals conforming to the values and norms of the group and one
deviates. When one deviates from the social group whose norms differ from the
society, he or she is said to be deviant.</span>
Answer:
My favorite artist right now is probably Vincent van Gogh. Thanks for asking and have a good day!
Explanation:
Answer:
D. is invalid because although on its face it's an intrastate law, this statute will have a significant economic effect on interstate commerce causing an undue burden
Explanation:
States can create laws that improve residents' lives by providing more security, education or infrastructure. Even if states have the autonomy to create their laws, some of them could not be sanctioned because they are the responsibility of the federal government and not the state. An example of this is the law made by the state of Kansas shown in the above question that, although it was created for a good reason (which was to promote road safety), it refers to an intrastate law that creates a significant burden on commerce between the state of Kansas and another state. This type of law can only be created by the federal government (specifically, the federal congress) to be valid.