Answer:
Hardin's explanation of the "tragedy of the commons" shows us several strategies that could be avoided to avoid, as it were, an overexploitation of natural resources and, as a consequence, a great universal tragedy.
Explanation:
The limitation of the human family is proposed as the main strategy, since according to Hardin the population density causes the limit of the use given to natural resources to be passed, since the greater the population, the more exploitation of natural resources, but I consider that It is not really an easy strategy to implement since the laws favor the freedom to decide how many children a partner should have and highlight the family as the basis of society, granting them the legitimate right to use the resources that are in your environment.
The main strategy I consider, is to raise awareness from our homes, to our children, about how important it is to take care and make a balanced use of human resources, teach them ways to recycle, teach them not to waste food and to love and value our nature and the resources that are at our disposal.
Answer:
complementarity
Explanation:
According to my research on different relationship aspects, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Alfredo was probably attracted to Belinda due to complementarity. This is when the personality or skills of one person, improve or emphasize the personality, skills, or defects of another person. Which seems to be the case in this situation since Alfredo is not good at certain things which Belinda makes up for with her skills.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The spring song says about rainbows and birds
Answer:
<h3>The Brown v Board of Education case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
</h3>
Explanation:
- The Brown v School of Education was a landmark case regarding public school segregation on the basis of race.
- Thurgood Marshall was the chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. The plaintiff attorney ruled out that segregation policy violated the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
- The case won an unanimous verdict against school segregation.
- After the case was won, the Supreme Court outlawed the practice of segregation in any public institutions.
