<span>It was the growing power of Parliament, and several incompetent monarchs which led to this. By the 17th century, Parliament had gained one power that the monarchy no longer had - they were in charge of raising taxes. King Charles I got into so many arguments over money, religion and political affairs that his own Parliament declared war on him. In the end, Parliament won and had the king executed. Oliver Cromwell became the dictator of England for 10 years (this period is known as the Commonwealth), and abolished an increasingly corrupt Parliament. After his death, both the Monarchy and Parliament were restored, and king Charles II became King. The Civil War led to a gradual increase in Parliament's power, which may well have stopped the country from having a revolution.
Hope this helps!</span>
My guess is :
Edmond Charles Genêt<span> served as French minister to the United States from 1793 to 1794. His activities in that capacity embroiled the United States and France in a diplomatic crisis, as the United States Government attempted to remain neutral in the conflict between Great Britain and Revolutionary France. The controversy was ultimately resolved by Genêt’s recall from his position. As a result of the Citizen Genêt affair, the United States established a set of procedures governing neutrality.</span>
Answer:
Correct answer is B. Boston Massacre
.
Explanation:
B is the correct answer as Revere wanted to present how British government and its soldiers were behaving towards the colonists. In this massacre some of the colonists were murdered, and Revere even used this event to strengthen the propaganda.
A is not correct as this refers to event when tea was thrown in the harbor of Boston.
B is also not correct as this proclamation was forbidding colonists to settle to the west.
C is also not correct as this was a war led between Britain and France in which the colonists participated.
<span>While the Pact of Steel—formally known as the Pact of Friendship—is initially conceptualized as an alliance between Germany, Italy, and Japan, there are issues with getting Japan on board. Japan wants to focus the agreement against the Soviet Union, however, Germany and Italy have plans to attack France and Great Britain. With no headway being made to include Japan on its terms, Japan is removed from the alliance. so all in all your answer should be ¨B¨</span>
It would be president obama. i would love to hear his thoughts on the current state of the government, and what he would change about it today.
