Answer:
<h3>The Brown v Board of Education case addresses whether public institutions can legally be divided by race.
</h3>
Explanation:
- The Brown v School of Education was a landmark case regarding public school segregation on the basis of race.
- Thurgood Marshall was the chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education. The plaintiff attorney ruled out that segregation policy violated the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
- The case won an unanimous verdict against school segregation.
- After the case was won, the Supreme Court outlawed the practice of segregation in any public institutions.
Answer: The correct answer is : The result is $ 51.83, but because the question refers to the estimated cost, the answer is $ 56
Explanation:
1 gal _________ $ 3.65
14.2 gal _______ X
If a gallon of gas costs $ 3.65, how much will 14.2 gal cost?
X = $ 3.65 x 14.2 gal / 1 gal
X = $ 51.83, estimated value $ 56
Answer:
The social cognitive theory provides practical solutions to the problems of people.
Explanation:
The theory offers a perspective for determining how people consciously shape and influence the world around them. The theory outlines the mechanisms of observer learning and modeling and the effect of self-efficacy on behavior development. The principle of social cognition has strong applicability in the real world. It can be used to teach healthy habits by role models or to demonstrate the negative effects of unhealthy behaviors as seen on TV shows.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
