Answer:
no enough evidence to draw up a conclusion
Step-by-step explanation:
Data:
let: 
= decay after 2 weeks
= decay after 16 weeks
Making the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis; 
the deviation = 0.05
the standard difference = 4
Conditions:
The normal distribution curve can be plotted on a graph and the plot shows that the distribution is a skewed distribution.
Then,
Therefore, it can be concluded that 0.1983 > 0.05. This presents our failure to reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that polyester decays more in less than 2 weeks.
<span>if 35% or 0.35 say no, to compute the probability that at least one of 7 </span>called a talk show while under the influence of peer pressure <span> is (1-0.35)^7 and subtract it from . This is the same as at least 1 has </span><span>called a talk show while under the influence of peer pressure
</span><span>1 - (1 - 0.35)^7 = 0.95
</span>
Answer:
14
Step-by-step explanation:
If he had 14 then he gave away 6, he'd have 8. 8 plus 4 is 12. He had 14 before giving any away.
The h in p will start the p and the glock I believe
-7 + -5
When you add negative, it would be the same as subtracting
Turns into: -7-5
-(7+5) = -12
The solutions is -12
