The correct answer is <span>C. weren't allowed to vote and didn't do well politically.
Other possible answers are incorrect due to historical inaccuracies.</span>
Andrew Jackson's presidency (who relied on the counsel of close friends ... presidents usually don't rely heavily on the advice of the formal cabinet. They are aware that department heads are often more responsive to the ... Congress loses leverage
hope this helps
Answer:
The correct answer is D. The Supremacy Clause ensures that the U.S. Constitution overrules each state constitution.
Explanation:
The Supremacy Clause provides for the Constitution and laws of the United States, as well as international treaties concluded by the United States, to be the supreme law of the country. This clause also obliges state judges to be governed by the US Constitution, laws, and international treaties, even if individual state constitutions and laws are contrary to federal law. State constitutions also recognize the supremacy of the US federal constitution. The Supremacy Clause is contained in Article VI of the US Constitution.
The correct answer: William
Lloyd Garrison
The most unmistakable and questionable change development of the period was abolitionism, the counter slave development. Despite the fact that abolitionism had pulled in numerous supporters in the progressive time frame, the development slacked amid the mid 1800s. By the 1830s, the soul of abolitionism surged, particularly in the Northeast. In 1831, William Lloyd Garrison propelled an abolitionist daily paper, The Liberator, acquiring himself a notoriety for being the most radical white abolitionist. Though past abolitionists had proposed blacks be dispatched back to Africa, Garrison worked in conjunction with noticeable dark abolitionists, including Fredrick Douglass, to request level with social liberties for blacks. Battalion's call to war was "prompt liberation," yet he perceived that it would take a long time to persuade enough Americans to restrict bondage. To spread the abrogation enthusiasm, he established the New England Anti-Slavery Society in 1832 and the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1833. By 1840, these associations had brought forth more than 1,500 nearby sections. All things considered, abolitionists were a little minority in the United States in the 1840s, regularly subjected to scoffing and physical brutality.
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
