Answer:
Fedala, Safi, and Casablanca
The facts of McCulloch v. Maryland led to a different holding than that of Hammer v. Dagenhart because it involved preventing states from taxing the Federal government.
<h3>What is Taxation?</h3>
This is defined as a compulsory levy or financial charge which is imposed on people so as to serve as a source of revenue thereby funding government spending.
The McCulloch v. Maryland case was about the Congress attempting to regulate the production of goods while the Hammer v. Dagenhart involved states wanting to tax the federal government via the federal bank.
Read more about Taxation here brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
Henry made a framework for trials that had Grand Jury Trials and normal trials. Amazing Jury trials chose whether or not the confirmation bolsters the allegation enough to go to a trial. The consistent trial chose if the blamed was honest or blameworthy. What's more, the juries were made of ordinary citizens rather than respectability.
I only know of two compromises, unless you are talking about the bill of rights. But the great compromise set a two house legislature, which is different from before because the states mostly had power. The three fifths compromise counted three fifths of the slaves as population. Except cool fact they weren’t called slaves they were called others. There was the free men and the others. It affected the country because it added onto the population. And the bill of rights was made to settle the conflict between the anti federalists and the federalists. The bill of rights was written by James Madison.
